6 Records Found.

Title:	Admiralty Jurisdiction Extends to Agent who Actually Performs Essential Services for Vessel. Hinkins Steamship Agency v. Freighters, Inc., 351 F. Supp. 373 (N.D. Cal. 1972)
Author:	Bar-Lev, Joshua
Subjects:	JURISDICTION; AGENTS
Type:	Case Note	Cite:	4 J. Mar. L. & Com. 480
Related:	No Related Documents
Title:	Admiralty Jurisdiction: Agency Agreements not per se Excluded. Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc., 500 U.S. 603, 1991 A.M.C. 1817 (1991)
Author:	Gruendel, Robert J.
Subjects:	JURISDICTION; AGENTS
Type:	Case Note	Cite:	23 J. Mar. L. & Com. 149
Related:	No Related Documents
Title:	Confirming House Transactions in Commonwealth Countries
Author:	Hill, D. J.
Subjects:	BANKING LAW; NEW ZEALAND; SOUTH PACIFIC; UNITED KINGDOM; AGENTS
Type:	Article	Cite:	3 J. Mar. L. & Com. 307	Full Text at On Line Library
Related:	No Related Documents
Title:	Crossing the Himalayas: Exculpatory Clauses in Global Transport. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004)
Author:	Sweeney, Joseph C.
Subjects:	ADMIRALTY COURTS; JURISDICTION; AGENTS; FREIGHT FORWARDERS; BILLS OF LADING; CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA; HAGUE RULES; HIMALAYA CLAUSE; MULTIMODALISM; CHOICE OF LAW; NON-VESSEL OPERATING COMMON CARRIERS; UNIFORMITY OF MARITIME LAW; NVOCCs
Type:	Article	Cite:	36 J. Mar. L. & Com. 155
Related:	Third-Party Beneficiaries in Multimodal Contracts of Carriage. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article); The "Himalaya" Clause Crosses Privity's Far Frontier. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article); Third-Party Beneficiaries in Multimodal Contracts of Carriage. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article)
Title:	The "Himalaya" Clause Crosses Privity's Far Frontier. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004)
Author:	Costabel, Attilio M.
Subjects:	ADMIRALTY COURTS; FEDERALISM; JURISDICTION; AGENTS; FREIGHT FORWARDERS; BILLS OF LADING; CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA; HIMALAYA CLAUSE; MULTIMODALISM; CHOICE OF LAW; COGSA; NON-VESSEL OPERATING COMMON CARRIERS; INTERMODALISM; UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; UNIFORMITY OF MARITIME LAW; NVOCCs
Type:	Article	Cite:	36 J. Mar. L. & Com. 217
Related:	Third-Party Beneficiaries in Multimodal Contracts of Carriage. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article), Crossing the Himalayas: Exculpatory Clauses in Global Transport. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article)
Title:	Third-Party Beneficiaries in Multimodal Contracts of Carriage. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004)
Author:	Theis, William H.
Subjects:	ADMIRALTY COURTS; FREIGHT FORWARDERS; AGENTS; BILLS OF LADING; CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA; HAGUE RULES; HIMALAYA CLAUSE; MULTIMODALISM; CONFLICT OF LAWS; NON-VESSEL OPERATING COMMON CARRIERS; INTERMODALISM; UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; UNIFORMITY OF MARITIME LAW; NVOCCs
Type:	Article	Cite:	36 J. Mar. L. & Com. 201
Related:	The "Himalaya" Clause Crosses Privity's Far Frontier. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article); Crossing the Himalayas: Exculpatory Clauses in Global Transport. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article); Crossing the Himalayas: Exculpatory Clauses in Global Transport. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 125 S. Ct. 385, 2004 AMC 2705 (2004) (Article)
Add New    1 of 1